Cisco’s Lead Time Pushes End-Users into the Secondary Network Equipment Market

January 7th, 2010
Comments Off

In Q3/Q4 2009, Cisco Systems mis-calculation in future demand and problems in their supply chain caused lead time for new purchases to go from approximately 2 weeks to 4-6 weeks. Because of this, end users scour the secondary network equipment markets for equipment to satisfy their deployment schedules. In the first two quarters of 2009, and due to economic turbulence, demand in the secondary market dropped dramatically thus causing a significant decrease in overall prices for the most popular items (such as WS-SUP720, WS-SUP720-3B, WS-SUP720-3BXL, WS-C2750G product line, NPE-G1, and NPE-G2’s as examples).

At the start of Q3, prices increased in a few short weeks as companies look to complete their budgets and adhere to deployment timelines. End-users, who normally who procure new equipment, were forced into the secondary market since Cisco Systems lead times shot up from the normal 2-4 weeks to 4-6 weeks and with some gear up to 6-8 weeks. This additional increase in demand created a situation where even the secondary market could not adequately supply.  For example, WS-SUP720 have more than doubled in price from this date compared to this date last year.

We have seen this through out the WS-SUP720 product line (WS-SUP720, WS-SUP720-3B, WS-SUP-720-3BXL) and with other products such as WS-F6700-DFC3BXL.

Robert Cisco, Lead times, Secondary Equipment Market, WS-SUP720, WS-SUP720-3B, WS-SUP720-3BXL

Cisco Partners With Clearwire 4G WiMax Network

May 14th, 2009
Comments Off

From: DOW JONES NEWSWIRES
Original Article: By Roger Cheng
Date: MAY 13, 2009

NEW YORK (Dow Jones)–Clearwire Corp. (CLWR) signed another high-profile partner in Cisco Systems Inc. (CSCO) as it races to roll out its next-generation wireless network.

In addition, the Kirkland, Wash., company posted a slightly narrower first-quarter loss on higher sales, although subscriber growth slowed, and reshuffled its management team.

Clearwire tapped Cisco to provide the network backbone to its fourth-generation WiMax service. The San Jose networking titan will eventually build mobile connection devices for the network, which Clearwire is slowly rolling out.

The San Jose networking titan joins forces with a few other Silicon Valley giants, including Intel Corp. (INTC) and Google Inc. (GOOG), in backing a technology that rivals a standard most carriers have chosen as their own 4G network. Unlike the other technology giants, Cisco isn’t investing in Clearwire. Financial terms weren’t disclosed.

While a positive thing, questions about Clearwire’s business remains.

“Although we view the announcement as positive for Clearwire’s ability to broaden its WiMax ecosystem partners, we continue to have significant concerns regarding its business model and cash burn in the face of a weak macro environment,” said Soleil Securities analyst Michael Nelson.

Clearwire posted a loss of $71.1 million, or 38 cents a share, compared with a loss of $76.4 million, or 41 cents, from a year ago. Sales rose 21% to $62.1 million.

Analysts expected a loss of 30 cents a share and sales of $63 million.

The company added 25,000 net new subscribers, compared with 48,000 from a year ago.

Clearwire also made some changes to its executive team. Barry West, who was the company’s president and chief architect, will instead oversee the international assets.

It also tapped three executives in a reshuffling of its management following the appointment of William Morrow as CEO in March. G. Michael Sievert will join as chief commercial officer, Kevin Hart will serve as chief information officer, and Laurent Bentitou will serve as chief people officer.

On the Cisco partnership, the networking company’s gear will go into the physical link between the radio antennas and the core central office. Much of wireless traffic congestion can be found on the older ground network, known in industry lingo as backhaul.

“It’s very strategic,” Clearwire Chief Strategy Officer Scott Richardson told Dow Jones Newswires on Wednesday.

Traditionally, telecom equipment comes from players such as L.M. Ericsson Telephone Co. (ERIC) or Alcatel Lucent (ALU). But the adoption of Internet protocols in 4G networks allows Cisco a chance to enter the business.

“Quite frankly, radio technologies between LTE and WiMax are similar,” Richardson said. “The focus should be more on the underlying IP network, and bandwidth needed to deliver next-generation services.”

Cisco executive Suraj Shetty was quick to point out that its IP network gear would work for both WiMax and LTE, which is what many of the U.S. carriers will be moving towards over the next few years.

For now, Richardson touts the time advantage Clearwire has with WiMax.

Clearwire said it would cover 120 million people in more than 80 markets by the end of 2010, although those plans were at the lower end of a previously provided range. Verizon Wireless, which is jointly owned by Verizon Communications Inc. (VZ) and Vodafone Group Plc (VOD), plans to begin deployment of its LTE network next year.

Cisco also plans to build WiMax devices likely to look like access devices similar to its Linksys routers and modems. The partnership with help Clearwire go after small businesses and enterprise customers, Richardson said.

“Clearwire is going to look to Cisco and its R&D muscle to provide leading edge features,” he said.

admin 4G , ,

Cisco Signs The Open Cloud Manifesto

March 30th, 2009

By James Urquhart  Cnet News Published March 29, 2009 10:34 PM PDT
As widely discussed since Wednesday night’s leak of its existence, the Open Cloud Manifesto–originally authored by IBM–has been released for public consumption.

This had been a difficult weekend for the document, first outed by Microsoft’s Steven Martin and then leaked in its entirety by my Overcast co-host, Geva Perry, the next day.

The discussion of the document has been muted, in part because the document is not a standards declaration or contract attached to any action or entity. Instead, it serves as a simple statement of principles that almost any cloud participant would agree with–at least publicly. However, the process in which it was brought into existence has been debated ferociously and may signify a changing of the guard in the standards world.

What is perhaps more interesting, however, is the list of signatories to the document. The list below is official as of Monday morning, according to my contact at IBM:

IB
AT&T
Telefonica

isco Systems

EMC

SAP

Advanced Micro Devices

Elastra

rPath

Nirvanix

OMG

Computer Science Corp.
Sun Microsystems
Red Hat

Hyperic

Akamai

Novell

Sogeti

Rackspace

RightScale

GoGrid
Boomi

Reservoir

Appistry
VMWare
Juniper Networks

Aptana

CastIron

EngineYard

Eclipse

SOASTA

F5

LongJump

NC State

Enomaly
Heroku

Note that the “big four” of cloud computing, Amazon.com, Microsoft, Google and Salesforce.com, are not signatories. However, several major players are on it, including my employer, Cisco–as well as EMC, Sun, VMware, and a host of key start-ups and established vendors throughout the industry.

There is a Cloud Computing Interoperability Forum meeting scheduled to be held Monday night in conjunction with Cloud Expo in New York City in which many, if not all of the signatories, and several that refused to sign (including Microsoft) will gather to talk about the future of cloud standards.

This could either be a historic meeting–or the final nail in the Manifestogate coffin.

The document itself is available on Scribd, or as a PDF from the official Opencloudmanifesto.org site or Perry’s Thinking Out Cloud blog.

Original article

admin The Cloud , ,

Dell data center vs. Cisco

March 26th, 2009

Analysis: Dell’s data center play will meet new opposition from Cisco’s system

By Jacqueline Emigh | betanews Published March 25, 2009, 4:26 PM

Today’s big data center announcements from Dell may have been expedited just a tad by Cisco, which stirred up interest last week after having unveiled its very first Unified Computing System. In an environment where other big companies are scaling back, Cisco is building on two fronts, the other one being the acquisition — also last week — of pocket camcorder maker Flip Video.

While switch-maker Cisco is a newcomer to data center servers, Dell already places third in the overall blade server rankings with a 9% market share, according to analyst group IDC. But although much less so than Cisco, Dell still has a long way to go to catch up with market leader Hewlett-Packard with its 58% share, and IBM with 22%.

Unlike Dell or any other incumbent vendor, Cisco has adopted the approach of building the storage fabric directly into the blade server, noted Gartner Group analysts.

“Cisco is attempting to use virtualization to break up the traditional server architecture by recombining it with networking technologies,” according to a recent Gartner report. “Cisco is differentiating itself in the systems market space, with a blade server and fabric interconnect as a single integrated management domain.”

“It’s the fact that UCS was launched as a system,” elaborated Philip Dawson, a Gartner analyst. Cisco’s “whole focus is on bringing all the components together as a system for virtualization,” Dawson told Betanews.

As delineated by Gartner, components in Cisco’s system include UCS Management, for integrated physical device management; fabric interconnect and fabric extenders for 10-gigabit Ethernet and Fibre Channel-over-Ethernet (FCoE) with extension capabilities; blade servers and enclosures for energy efficiency and memory expansion for workloads; and virtual adapters for both network interface controllers (NICs) and virtual host bus adapters (HBAs).

“There’s a philosophical difference, and it’s fairly substantial,” concurred Charles King, principal analyst for Pund-IT, speaking with Betanews. “But what kind of success Cisco will achieve is uncertain right now.”

Yet while Cisco’s strategy is unprecedented, it’s a more conservative choice than an alternative approach Cisco might have taken, Dawson said.

“Cisco could have been disruptive and revolutionary as a fabric vendor. Instead, they launched an evolution [around] blade servers, an ambitious but [safer] bet,” the Gartner analyst said.

Original Article

admin Data Center , , ,